When revisiting the ideas of Lev Vygotsky, we realize that the very notion of a tool already goes beyond a purely utilitarian meaning. For him, tools—whether material or symbolic—mediate the relationship between the individual and the world. They do not merely assist action; they constitute it. Moreover, they reorganize psychological functioning itself, influencing ways of thinking, feeling, and learning.
In this sense, we must problematize: when we talk about digital technologies in education, are we truly dealing with “tools” in the classical sense? Or are we facing something deeper—cultural artifacts that reconfigure social, cognitive, and pedagogical practices?
The idea of technology as a tool suggests control, externality, and neutrality. We use a tool, master its functioning, and apply it according to our intentions. However, this logic does not hold in the face of contemporary digital technologies. Digital platforms, social networks, algorithms, and interactive environments are not passive; they structure possibilities for action, shape interactions, and influence processes of meaning-making.
It is at this point that the notion of a digital artifact becomes more fruitful. Unlike a tool, an artifact is not merely a means to an end; it is a cultural production imbued with intentions, values, and historically situated modes of use. A digital artifact is not simply used—it is appropriated, resignified, and, at the same time, it also transforms us.
When a student interacts in a virtual environment, for example, they are not just “using a tool.” They are immersed in an ecosystem of mediations involving language, digital culture, forms of social interaction, and specific modes of knowledge organization. In this context, the digital artifact actively participates in shaping the learning experience.
Read more at: https://fernandoscpimentel.blogspot.com/2026/03/digital-technologies-tools-or-artifacts_22.html
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário